Do psychological associations in Canada value and promote evidence-based practice? A content analysis of psychological association websites
Digital Document
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
---|---|
Content type |
Content type
|
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
Genre |
Genre
|
Language |
Language
|
Persons |
Author (aut): Welch, Steven J.
|
---|
Origin Information |
|
---|
Abstract |
Abstract
The Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) adopted evidence-based practice (EBP) as the model for the professional practice of psychology in Canada in 2014. Despite this, the scientist–practitioner gap remains, and it may extend to Canadian psychological institutions. For example, Beaulieu et al. (2020) found that psychotherapy-related continuing education opportunities advertised in the Ordre des Psychologues du Québec were not always evidence-based. This raises a broader question: Do Canadian Psychological Associations value and promote EBP? I developed a methodology that permitted me to answer this question. The methodology has utility because it allows for a quick assessment of all Canadian Psychological Associations, and it can be easily repeated to track changes over time. My findings suggest that the scientist–practitioner gap extends to Canadian Psychological Associations. The implications of these findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
|
---|
Conference/Events |
Conference/Events
|
---|
Publication Title |
Publication Title
|
---|---|
Publication Number |
Publication Number
Volume 64, Issue 1
|
DOI |
DOI
10.1037/cap0000319
|
---|
Note |
|
---|
Identifier URI | |
---|---|
Use and Reproduction |
Use and Reproduction
© Canadian Psychological Association.
|
Rights Statement |
Rights Statement
|
Subject Topic |
---|